<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why, oh why ?!? Windows 7 &#8211; 32 bit version.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.markstahler.ca/2009/01/why-oh-why-windows-7-32-bit-version/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.markstahler.ca/2009/01/why-oh-why-windows-7-32-bit-version/</link>
	<description>Coding, Gaming, CrackBerry&#039;ing and everything else white and nerdy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 05:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Vuitton Handbags</title>
		<link>http://blog.markstahler.ca/2009/01/why-oh-why-windows-7-32-bit-version/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Vuitton Handbags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markstahler.ca/2009/01/why-oh-why-windows-7-32-bit-version/#comment-50</guid>
		<description>original Crysis for a short while experimenting and poorly supporting 64 bit the executables? Wouldn’t it be nice to have all game developers utilizing my new hardware instead of a few just testing the waters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>original Crysis for a short while experimenting and poorly supporting 64 bit the executables? Wouldn’t it be nice to have all game developers utilizing my new hardware instead of a few just testing the waters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Vuitton Handbags</title>
		<link>http://blog.markstahler.ca/2009/01/why-oh-why-windows-7-32-bit-version/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Vuitton Handbags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markstahler.ca/2009/01/why-oh-why-windows-7-32-bit-version/#comment-45</guid>
		<description>original Crysis for a short while experimenting and poorly supporting 64 bit the executables? Wouldn’t it be nice to have all game developers utilizing my new hardware instead of a few just testing the waters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>original Crysis for a short while experimenting and poorly supporting 64 bit the executables? Wouldn’t it be nice to have all game developers utilizing my new hardware instead of a few just testing the waters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.markstahler.ca/2009/01/why-oh-why-windows-7-32-bit-version/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markstahler.ca/2009/01/why-oh-why-windows-7-32-bit-version/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I forgot to mention Netbooks in the entry and I agree, that is an exception. I dont have a problem with 32 bit Windows 7 (if they can even run it) but on brand new desktop machines that are already shipping with 3-4 gb of ram?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to mention Netbooks in the entry and I agree, that is an exception. I dont have a problem with 32 bit Windows 7 (if they can even run it) but on brand new desktop machines that are already shipping with 3-4 gb of ram?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caleb</title>
		<link>http://blog.markstahler.ca/2009/01/why-oh-why-windows-7-32-bit-version/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markstahler.ca/2009/01/why-oh-why-windows-7-32-bit-version/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Nice rant... I guess it all comes down to the hardware. 32 bit is limiting with regards to future hardware upgrades (ie, processors &amp; ram). But unless you&#039;re running a quad core system w 4GB of RAM, there&#039;s no real *need* for a 64bit OS. Like a netbook for example.

However, given that alot of people just don&#039;t think about future upgradeability when acquiring an OS, or a system that comes pre-loaded with an OS (which for the most part, is 32bit). It ends up potentially being a cash cow for M$ in the future - when people DO want faster hardware w/ more RAM etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice rant&#8230; I guess it all comes down to the hardware. 32 bit is limiting with regards to future hardware upgrades (ie, processors &amp; ram). But unless you&#8217;re running a quad core system w 4GB of RAM, there&#8217;s no real *need* for a 64bit OS. Like a netbook for example.</p>
<p>However, given that alot of people just don&#8217;t think about future upgradeability when acquiring an OS, or a system that comes pre-loaded with an OS (which for the most part, is 32bit). It ends up potentially being a cash cow for M$ in the future &#8211; when people DO want faster hardware w/ more RAM etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

